To this date, [my brother] has made his abilities most useful for calming the remaining masses of humanity in our Chancel, though it seems likely that he has an interesting role to play in future events. On more than a single occasion, he has attempted to put forth some logical arguments, which are often interesting, though not always valid or derived from fact. This is quite likely some part of his nature, as Stories, as a concept rather than a person, though admittedly when dealing with gods and anthropomorphic personifications the distinction my be insginificant or invalid (it is possible that the distinction remains purely as a matter of perspective, much like the difference between a particle of light and a wave, or between the two Earths) are focused more on arguments that are interesting and appealing on the surface rather than solidly constructed, and this aspect of Stories is likely reflected in [my sibling], as just described. These differences might possibly cause some future disagreements, though I cannot predict with both precision and accuracy when or why such a conflict might arise.